The Supreme Being
"Evolutionary Due Process"
Similar to the metamorphosis of an earth-bound caterpillar becoming a free-flying butterfly, Man’s unique “first in time” genesis and faultless right of way “evolutionary due process” from a non-reducible single-celled Zygote in the womb to a mature non-reducible thoroughly inspired, enlightened, and self-governing man beyond the womb may be a mysterious thing to the unlearned huddled masses, but truth be told, such a thing occurs each and every day within the faultless Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.
“When a change of government takes place, from a monarchial to a republican government, the old form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not choose to become members of the new, had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere. By being a part of the society subject to the old government, they had not entered into any engagement to become subject to any new form the majority might think proper to adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature.” – Cruden vs Neale 2 N.C. 338 (N.C. Super. 1796)
Imagine the nightmare experienced by a butterfly unable to fully disconnect from the burden of its earth-bound past and “infant” counterpart. Now imagine the “first-born” baby forever dragging around the membranous dead-weight of undelivered afterbirth mass by mistakenly adopting the phantom limb “past” of a fictitious “second-coming” pre-conceived, faith-based, conventional “child of God” – while losing his “present” life and self-government in the process.
“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.” – Isaiah 9:6 KJV
And yet, such “immaculate conception” is borne via public record to represent medically undelivered infant membranes historically frozen in time and space per Gregorian calendar “birth” to be issued nationally as federally protected health information (PHI) following the violently hewn feto-maternal member and original “birthday cake” known scientifically as the placenta. The voluntary celebration of such ruinous “minor” by a mature man every 365 days is the very definition of insanity.
“In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.” – 1 USC 8
To be clear, while the First Amendment of the United States Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” such cannot be established via violent crime upon an innocent newborn in order to invent a separate distressed vessel taken for granted as a faith-based deposit or sacrificial “pound of flesh” – for the truth is, when such original measures are taken by violence all subsequent acts are “ex injuria jus non oritur.”
“In 1933 the nations of the American hemisphere condemned wars of aggression and agreed that the settlement of controversies of any kind should be effected “only by the pacific means which have the sanction of international law.” Finally, “peoples… determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war’ created the United Nations “to maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means … adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace.” – Ex Injuria Jus Non Oritur: A Principle Misapplied – Sherman L. Cohn
The mayhem of One’s excised afterbirth mass and “means of transport” to the new world beyond the womb does not prove the demise of One’s original “kingdom” and foreign sovereign immunity – only the intent to use One’s purposely undelivered and “gratuitously bailed” vessel as a legal prosthesis/remedy in a feigned 14th Amendment reconstruction of One’s genuine “continuous and contiguous” (jus cogens) evolutionary due process.
(a) Whoever assaults, strikes, wounds, imprisons, or offers violence to a foreign official, official guest, or internationally protected person or makes any other violent attack upon the person or liberty of such person, or, if likely to endanger his person or liberty, makes a violent attack upon his official premises, private accommodation, or means of transport or attempts to commit any of the foregoing shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Whoever in the commission of any such act uses a deadly or dangerous weapon, or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. – 18 U.S. Code § 112 – Protection of foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons
The truth is, each and every day One’s authentic 46-chromosome spiritual presence provides incontrovertible physical proof that neither my body nor my soul died – or was “lost at sea” – upon my arrival at the port of entry to the land/air-based environment beyond mom’s water-based womb. I, for One, am all present and accounted for from fertilization to last breath.
“Then this case was compared to a probate of a supposed will of a living person; but in such a case, the ecclesiastical court have no jurisdiction, and the probate can have no effect; their jurisdiction is only to grant probates of the wills of dead persons. The distinction in this respect is this: if they have jurisdiction, their sentence, as long as it stands unrepealed, shall avail in all other places, but where they have no jurisdiction, their whole proceedings are a nullity.” – Scott vs McNeal, 154 U.S., 34 (1894)
Sadly, such contrived measure (particular end) is taken with the aid of a medical society performing “partial births” at the threshold of mother’s “swampy” matrix and external “dry” environment beyond the womb resulting in the arrested development of One’s violently removed feto-maternal organ “bundle of rights” and the misdelivery of One’s naturally “perfect” evolutionary due process.
“Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.” – Palermo Protocols / Article 3
The fact is, the Church and State become co-conspirators in the monopoly of One’s medically undelivered “rule of law” by recording the severed partial birth measure – fetal avulsion/maternal accretion – to be used for a feigned “fictitious” reconstruction via religious salvation of a dis-eased indigenous heathen/savage on the land – or – Admiralty salvage operation of a derelict/wrecked vessel “lost at sea.”
“No fiction shall extend to work an injury, its proper operation being to prevent a mischief or remedy an inconvenience which might result from the general rule of law.” – Blackstone’s Commentaries
The Truth is, Nature’s evolutionary due process from original single-cell Zygote in the womb to the trillion-celled baby beyond the womb constitutes a complete delivery of One’s entire “original package” upon the continental United States (Brown v. Maryland, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 (1827) – medically defined as the “fetus and its membranes” a.k.a. baby, umbilical cord (cable), and extra-embryonic matter.
CH 12 Sixty-Seventh Congress (1921) – “And provided further, That the conditions of this (license) Act shall not apply to cables, all of which, including both terminals, lie wholly within the continental United States.”
Again, like the caterpillar to the butterfly, Man has only one true origin – fertilization – consisting of only one substantial “intelligently designed” quintessence – Zygote – evolving via evolutionary due process into one genuine spiritual man i.e. “person in being.” One’s Zygote is a true force majeure “act of God” combining the two bloodlines (vines) of mom and dad into one di-vine Supreme Being. Baby is, in truth and fact, the “offspring” of the Zygote alone as evidenced by One’s identical DNA. Thus, the Zygote is the exact point where “Darwin meets God.”
“I and my Father are one.”- John 10:30 KJV
Interestingly, “in the US the National Institutes of Health has determined that the traditional classification of pre-implantation embryo is still correct” – meaning One’s whole “First Estate” is disease-free requiring no modification or quarantine whatsoever.
“And Jesus answering said unto them, They that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick.” – Luke 5:31 KJV
The fact is, my “little g” genesis and earthly sojourn – a.k.a. My Story – begins and ends in the spirit-filled present moment only. One’s Supreme Being includes the “breath of God” as mortal life (foreign to any fictitious narrative) is wholly inspired. While a resident of the mom’s matrix, she is my inspiration. Mom is my sole source of support until the complete delivery – a.k.a. baby, umbilical cord, and extra-embryonic membranes. Beyond the womb, my lungs are my spiritual “wings” – when filled with the “breath of God” I am able to soar.
“But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.” – 1 Corinthians 2:15 KJV
History, on the other hand, begins when My Story beyond the womb ends with One’s final expiration. Thus, “the present” and “the past” are mutually exclusive. Any confusion – intentional or otherwise – between a DECEDENT ESTATE (graven image) and my authentic Supreme Being is a fundamental impossibility. One cannot be both dead and alive.
Impossibility. That which in the constitution and course of nature or the law, no man can do or perform. – Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition (1979)
to be continued.
The PMA
Society of the Sojourner - A Private Member Association
What is a PMA?
Traditionally, a Private Membership Association (PMA) is a legal organization that allows people to come together and pool their resources in order to reach a shared goal. PMAs are created to promote the exchange of information, assets, or services within the group. In contrast to public entities, PMAs are not subject to the same strict regulations, as they function as private entities. PMA’s go back as far as the 1950’s when they were established to protect the right to associate and the right to privacy for civil rights groups. Today, PMA’s exist as healthcare centers, bars, restaurants, gyms and markets/co-ops.
Keeping One’s genuine “little g” genesis in mind, I, created a private member association (PMA) to forever relieve One’s present Supreme Being – all present and accounted for from fertilization to last breath – from the undue influence, duplicty, and injurious climate of an historically frozen “Gregorian” infant mass, measure, rule, etc., arising (PHI) from the obstruction of Nature’s evolutionary due process specific to a medically incomplete delivery. I have formally tagged the “mature” peaceable assembly of PMA Members: Society of the Sojourner.
Most people have yet to realize that their own “self-government” rests upon their own shoulders and thus is genuinely FOREIGN to all other governments – fictional or otherwise. One’s foreign government is an “internationally protected person” as defined at 18 USC 112. And as a matter of fact, One’s biological body (personality) is the ONLY “means of transport” for said Foreign Government.
18 U.S. Code § 112 – Protection of foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons
1624. Substantive Offenses — Assault — 18 U.S.C. 112
18 U.S.C. § 112(a) prohibits assaults against foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons (IPPs), and attacks upon the official premises, private accommodations, or means of transport of such persons. The provision also embraces attempts to commit such offenses. By its terms, § 112(a) neither requires proof of injury nor intent to injure a protected person. See United States v. Gan, 636 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1020 (1981).
18 U.S.C. § 112(b) prohibits acts of intimidation, threats, coercion and harassment against foreign officials and official guests, and obstruction of foreign officials in the performance of their duties.
In contrast with 18 U.S.C. § 111, which prohibits assaults upon U.S. government employees, the word “forcibly” does not appear in relation to the term “obstructs” in 18 U.S.C. § 112(b). Consequently, the use of force does not appear necessary in connection with resisting or interfering with the performance of a foreign official’s duties. Cf. Long v. United States, 119 F.2d 717, 719 (4th Cir. 1952).
Because of the extraterritorial reach of 18 U.S.C. § 112(e), which permits prosecution under this section if a defendant who has victimized an internationally protected person is “present” within the United States, conspiracy to commit a violent act against an internationally protected person outside the jurisdiction of the United States is prohibited and subject to prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 371.
Senate Report No. 1105, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 18 (1972), reprinted at 1972 U.S. Code. Cong. and Adm. News 4316, 4327, includes the following acts as illustrative of the misconduct intended to be covered in 18 U.S.C. § 112(b) if done “with intent to intimidate, alarm, or persecute a foreign official or an official guest”:
- Following 1 (a foreign official or official guest) about in public place or places after being requested not to do so.
- Engaging in a course of conduct, including the use of abusive language, or repeatedly committing acts which alarm, intimidate or persecute him which serve no legitimate purpose; or
- Communicating with him anonymously by telephone, telegraph, or otherwise in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm, or making repeated telephone calls to him whether or not conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate communication.
The list is not all-inclusive (S. Rep. No. 1105 at 19) and other ways of violation, either more sophisticated or crude, will no doubt occur to one bent on harassment, etc. The Senate Report also cites State and Federal law of more general applicability that will also reach most other, if not all, such activity. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. §§ 875, 876 (concerning threatening telephonic or mailed communications).
1 Following: Explore this concept and the language used.
Link to definition
BENEFITS OF JOINING THE PMA
The Fair Warning Letter
By joining the PMA, you will have access to the Letter template that evidences your Right of Way,
25+ hours of Audio
A detailed explanation on how to use The Fair Warning Letter.
Live Calls
Access to live calls with Kurt and other members.
Society of the Sojourner
Connect with other members via a private Telegram Group to discus related topics.
The Books
Right Of Way
A Pacific Transcription
by Kurtis R. Kallenbach
For many years I’ve sought the initial “rule of law” proving One’s personal and private continuous and contiguous dominion over a violently removed “jus cogens” fetal measure accounting for the internationally recognized rest, residue, and remainder of One’s foundational SUPREME BEING.
I found it.
First In Time
A Pacific Transcription
by Kurtis R. Kallenbach
There is a legal maxim, “fictio cedit veritati” that means fictions yields to truth. “First in Time” includes the transcription of conversation between two longtime “pacifists” which clearly evidences a “Living Truth” beyond the presumption of any fictitious record or narrative created specifically to gain access to One’s genuine nature via trespass, as well as a highly deductive and learned exposition by the Author as to the lawful scope of such enlightened testimony. It is a must read for anyone with “eyes to see” the absurdity and confusion of a world completely devoid of Truth.